Fremantle shipping harbour expansion plan killed off as report backs new Kwinana port





Posted

August 15, 2019 13:28:32

Western Australia is set to build a new shipping port in Kwinana, after an expansion of the existing Fremantle facility was ruled out by the government taskforce examining the state’s freight needs.

Key points:

  • A report ruled road and rail access remained a major problem for Fremantle
  • Five options for a new port at Kwinana are being considered
  • But the Opposition says Roe 8 and 9 should have been examined

Five options for a new Kwinana container port will now be examined in greater detail, including one which would create a so-called “blue highway” linking Fremantle to the new outer harbour by sea.

But the taskforce, set up by the McGowan Government to push its outer harbour promise, dismissed the feasibility of relying purely on Fremantle for WA’s freight needs into the future.

It ruled that even with the construction of the contentious Roe 8 highway extension and other proposed infrastructure improvements, difficulties with road and rail access into Fremantle Port would remain too significant.

“The high cumulative capital costs, concerns over the long-term sustainability and scalability and large levels of social impact, meant that the two stand-alone Fremantle options … performed poorly,” the report stated.

The report also talked up the benefits of moving the port from Fremantle, such as fewer freight vehicles in the western suburbs and the ability to redevelop land at the existing facility for other uses.

Ports Minister Alannah MacTiernan said the ruling that a new port would be needed in Kwinana was “unsurprising”, saying there were “significant economic and social impediments” towards Fremantle options.

“The timing, scale and cost estimates of the new port will now be confirmed,” Ms MacTiernan said.

Opposition attacks report

The State Opposition dismissed the findings as a “Mickey Mouse report”, because Roe 8 and 9 were not factored into the technical studies which examined the various options.

“The report is fatally flawed,” Liberal transport spokeswoman Libby Mettam said.

The most radical of the proposals is the “blue highway” shared port option, which would involve containers being moved from large ships onto smaller barges in Fremantle.

“The barges would then transport the containers directly down to the Kwinana port for offloading onto trucks,” the report stated.

The taskforce said it would now undertake further investigations of all five options before again assessing cost and environmental and social impact, with a final recommendation to then be made to the Government.

A total of 23 options were assessed, with the bottom four all proposals involving Bunbury.

The report stated high operational and capital costs due to the distance from Perth, plus environmental concerns, made the idea of using the South West city as the site of the port unviable.

Topics:

state-parliament,

states-and-territories,

government-and-politics,

urban-development-and-planning,

road-transport,

sea-transport,

perth-6000,

wa,

kwinana-beach-6167,

fremantle-6160



Source link

About the Author

Australia News
More Than 20 Years in News and jobs

Be the first to comment on "Fremantle shipping harbour expansion plan killed off as report backs new Kwinana port"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


%d bloggers like this: